Thursday, February 23, 2012

Paper Outline

1. Connectivity: The use of cognitive metaphor in Proust's "The Cookie" and Cavendish's "The Circle of the Brain Cannot be Squared"

2. Introductory paragraph:


Metaphor is a common literary technique that has been used by various authors across the centuries. Metaphors allow authors to compare an object to another object with which a reader may have more familiarity. Another function of the metaphor is to give the reader another frame of reference regarding the object, often to guide a reader’s interpretation. Although metaphor is most commonly seen in literature, cognitive metaphor is a type of metaphor utilized by individuals unconsciously. Cognitive metaphor theory states that individuals process abstract ideas by relating them to a more concrete idea. In Proust’s “The Cookie” and Margaret Cavendish’s “The Circle of the Brain cannot be squared”, the authors use cognitive metaphor to assist the reader with their interpretation of both pieces of literature. Cognitive metaphor in these two pieces also present the reader with comparison’s of the brain as a whole in Cavendish and specifically the concept of memory in Proust’s. Both the brain and memory are both complicated concepts; although both are concrete in that individuals are aware of them, they are extremely abstract in that very little is known about the brain and memory and how each works. In addition, both pieces of literature are evidence of bridging the gap between the arts and sciences, two fields of study assumed to be unrelated. In reality, the study of the arts and the study of science are closely interrelated, to the extent that neither can exist without the other. Proust’s “The Cookie” and Cavendish’s “The Circle of the Brain Cannot be Squared” utilize cognitive metaphor in order to assist the reader’s understanding of the literature and demonstrate the interdependence of different fields of study, specifically the arts and the sciences.

3. Metaphor is most commonly recognized as a literary technique; however, our brains subconsciously utilize metaphor on a daily basis.
 
Proust’s “The Cookie” exemplifies not only literary metaphor, but also discusses cognitive metaphor as utilized by the brain.

The idea of metaphor arises as Proust anthropomorphizes memory by stating “the memory revealed itself” (Proust).

I have been working on the paragraphs regarding Cavendish's poem; however, I'm re-working the paragraphs because I haven't been happy with how I originally wrote them. 

4. I'm also re-writing my conclusion but the general premise is an extension of how the two pieces of literature create a direct relation between the arts and the sciences. Cavendish's entire poem is centered around this theme, while Proust's narrative also does the same, but in  a less obvious way. 

After I have finished up the paragraphs and conclusion, I will post those.

1 comment:

  1. 1. Read the introduction and then the conclusion. What differences are there between them, if any? Catalogue these differences below:

    The Conclusion seems to connect the Arts and Sciences more so than the intro.

    2. Now read the topic sentences. Do they make claims? If not, mark the ones that don’t.

    All make claims

    3. Do the topic sentence claims make the connection/progression clear between the intro and the conclusion? What aspects of them do this connecting work? Record below:
    While there is a progression there are some topic sentences missing that can fill the gap between establishing the metaphor and the interaction between arts and sciences. The present topics do transition smoothly from metaphor's definition (intro) to Proust.

    4. What parts of the conclusion are not accounted for in the topic sentences? What parts of the topic sentences are not accounted for in the conclusion? Record below:
    While there are missing links to the conclusion and a conclusion summary, I would be aware to include proust and metaphor in the conclusion in relation to this Sci-Arts relationship. Another thing I would keep in mind is whether the Arts and Science are actually seen as separate or rather that it has evolved overtime to be seen as such. There are many scientists during this period that were also writers and students of history and philosophy. This is just a suggestion and feel free to ignore it, but I just wanted to point out that the word science was just becoming popular in the later 1700's I believe. Anywho, overall sounds like a solid paper.

    ReplyDelete